Note: Devil Incarnate, Douglas Wood, has abused his conjugal privileges and has already posted a rebuttal to my post. You can read it at http://www.douglaswood.net.
I must admit: I didn’t watch the debate Monday Night. I didn’t watch the one on the Thursday either. I saw none of them, in fact. Unconcerned? Uninterested? Not at all. I’m intensely invested in who wins this year’s election. It’s only that the debates, and the endless prognostications leading up to, and equally endless recaps following, these slugfests, have a specific purpose, and one that I find increasingly disquieting: to churn the waters of discord.
I must admit: I didn’t watch the debate Monday Night. I didn’t watch the one on the Thursday either. I saw none of them, in fact. Unconcerned? Uninterested? Not at all. I’m intensely invested in who wins this year’s election. It’s only that the debates, and the endless prognostications leading up to, and equally endless recaps following, these slugfests, have a specific purpose, and one that I find increasingly disquieting: to churn the waters of discord.
Debates as blood sport...
Better yet, let's make debates into musicals! It worked for Hairspray...
Now, don’t get me wrong: there are serious issues at stake
here, ones worth fighting for and promoting. And yes, I understand the intent:
to fill campaign coffers and goad a sleepy, nose-picking electorate to the
voting booth. It’s just the emotional hyperbole that leaves me anxious and exhausted. We
want bipartisanship, but how is that possible when we also demand blood and
fear apocalypse? The first election I remember was between McGovern and Nixon
(am I dating myself here?). In school we held our own elections and discussed
positions. Now, my seven-year-old niece comes home in tears, distraught because it was a fact that if
the other guy won there would be the absolute certainty of war. How can fight our way
back to the center from that?
Debate #4: Thunderdome! We all know Mel Gibson's
a Romney man, so does that make Obama Master Blaster?
a Romney man, so does that make Obama Master Blaster?
This tribal drumbeat is further compounded all of our social
media, the barrage of constant political updates that ping from our little
screens, Liliputian cries of repudiation and outrage, often more interesting in
scoring points off of verbal mis-steps and tactical errors than the actual
issues. We delight in the crude (but pretty funny) characterization of our Opponent
while castigating the Other Side for doing the same thing to Our Man. Behind a
thicket of like-minded friends, we more than vilify the opposition;
increasingly we cannot even fathom
them. The other day a friend on Facebook “liked” the other side; I stared at
the post in disbelief. How could he be my friend if he liked that monster? How
was he so colossally misinformed? The fact that he, too, was thinking the same
thing about me (that is, if he had not already turned off my feed) does not
diminish my incomprehension.
Now, this is theatricality used to great effect,
employing conflict and narrative... with a twist ending! Soylent Green is people!
employing conflict and narrative... with a twist ending! Soylent Green is people!
How is this impasse going to change? I have no earthly idea. I may decry partisan behavior but I'm out there sharing and liking with the rest of my brothers-in-arms. Can one have passion without devolving into bitter enmity? In a couple of weeks the Most Important Election of Our Times will be over, and
maybe things will calm down. I doubt this. I’m sure the storyboards
are already being prepped for the Most Important Election of Our Times—Part 2!
We dearly love a sequel. Unfortunately, that means four more years of partisan
roadblocks and government stagnation (remember the whole “house divided” trope?). Maybe, just maybe, we could try curbing our taste for explosions and shoot-outs
and get in line for something quieter, something with a little more dialogue. You
know, like those grown-up movies.
Okay, let the comments begin!